E-Legacies: Learning Resources for 2010 Games

Skip Navigation to Content 2010 Today Discussion Starters 2010-2012 Learning: What's Happening 2010-2012 Online Resources
Bookmark and Share

2010 Learning Legacies Competition – $7,000 in Prizes

Learning Legacies Competition

Entry Form

upload your powerpoint, pdf, or word document below

Brought to you by the Certified Management Accountants of British Columbia

For BC post-secondary students: The phenomenon of the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Games presents you with a terrific learning opportunity! IAs you observe the issues generated during this mega-event , Impress us with your critical thinking skills by offering a creative response to one of two questions by March 31st, 2010:

  1. 2010 Games Impacts "Under the Microscope": what's your analysis of the current value and impact of the Games on an individual business, your communities, the host city, region, or BC as a whole? Feel free to tackle the question on either a small or large scale, and address as many impacts and issues as you like. You can find inspiration by reading the 2010 Today Discussion Starters by clicking here.
  2. 2010 Games Impacts "Crystal Ball": what's your analysis of the potential lasting value and impacts of the Games for individual businesses, your community, the host communities, region, or BC as a whole? Feel free to tackle the question on either a small or large scale, and address as many impacts and issues as you like. You can find inspiration by reading the 2010 Today Discussion Starters by clicking here.

Whether you’re close to the Winter Games action in a Vancouver or Whistler, or elsewhere in the province, we want your input! Conduct research on-the-ground (observation, surveys, interviews), using academic and industry reports, and/or by following the news (traditional and social media). Then submit your answer in one of the following formats, choosing the most powerful way to address your topic:

The most convincing, creative, and compelling answers in each category will be reviewed by a panel of industry experts.

Prizes

All participants will receive a Certificate of Participation, branded with contest details. One set of prizes will be awarded to the top three answers in each of the two categories:

There is an opportunity (logistics, budget pending) for winners to attend an awards presentation at the annual Tourism Industry Conference (Fall 2010) and/or the CMA BC conference (May 2010).

Contest/Participant Requirements

Submissions can come from individual students, or student teams of any size (students will share prize equally). Students must be registered (full or part-time) in a British Columbia post-secondary business, tourism/hospitality, arts, or sciences program. Proof of registration will be required prior to prize disbursement. Submissions become the property of the Learning Legacies Contest and may be used for non-commercial, educational purposes.

Submissions will comprise a creative response to one of the following questions: (1) 2010 Games Impacts "under the microscope" OR (2) 2010 Games Impacts "crystal ball", due no later than 5:00 pm March 31st, 2010, in any one of the following formats:

Submissions MUST include up-front identification of student(s) name, school, program, and contact information in order to be eligible. Entries without this information will be discarded.

The most convincing, creative, and compelling answers in each category will be chosen by a panel of industry experts. Winners will be selected and announced on April 15th, 2010. Winning answers and other exemplary entries will be displayed on the contest website and at www.elegacies.ca.

How to Submit Your Entry

Submissions are welcome any time before March 31st, 2010. Simply fill out the form at right, then click "Submit".


Evaluation Criteria 2010 Learning Legacies Contest

click here to view as pdf

LEARNING LEGACIES CONTEST: SUBMISSION CRITERIA
Each judge will complete a scoring sheet for each submission. Regardless of format, all entries for Question 1 (‘microscope’) will compete against each other; all entries for Question 2 (‘crystal ball’) will compete against each other. Top three winners (gold, silver, bronze) in each question area will be determined based on highest average scores.
Points Out Of Sub‐Total
1. Introduction of Competitor/Team: Who are you? 10 points: Student(s) introduced in a creative, succinct way. Short biographical information (hometown, program of study, biases) are provided to help the judges understand the person/people behind the submission.   10  
2. Selection of Topic and Area of Study: What are you analyzing? 25 points: Student(s) clearly convey which topic question is being answered (‘microscope’ or ‘crystal ball’) and clearly describe scope of study (individual business, their own community, host cities, or the province as a whole) and study timeframe. It is very clear what issues will be reviewed: are these general economic, social, environmental issues? Are these related to a very specific phenomenon? Clarity is key! Students have also reviewed the Discussion Starters at http://elegacies.ca/2010/?discussion‐starters for inspiration.

  • Ex: “I am studying the economic impact of the Games on a small business in my home community from February 12th to March 28th.
  • Ex: “Our team is turning our crystal ball towards the issue of homelessness in host communities: we will make three predictions about the impact of the Olympics on the issue of homelessness in Greater Vancouver by 2015.”
  25  
3. Answer to the Question/Research: What did you find out? How did you find out? 50 points: Student(s) answer the question in a clear and appealing way. Student(s) find creative ways to get answers either “on the ground” and/or using information available through traditional and online media sources. Research sources (primary or secondary) are cited. A clear, concise summary shows the judges (in as few words as possible) what the student(s) learned.   50  
4. Quality and Creativity of Work/ Accuracy 15 points: Submission is free of errors - which may include spelling mistakes in written and PowerPoint pieces, grammatical errors in video dialogue, missing pieces/glitches in audio/visual components. Submission is clear and easy to follow. Media selected for answer is a good match for the level/scope of work undertaken and is visually appealing.   15  
Score (to be combined with scores from all judges and divided by # of judges for average score) ___ / 100